Martha Compton - The University of Texas at Austin

5 stars
(0)
4 stars
(0)
3 stars
(0)
2 stars
(0)
1 stars
(1)
Category: Education

Contact Information
Austin, Texas, United States

Martha Compton - The University of Texas at Austin Reviews

ExposeTheLies April 21, 2011
Martha Compton - Judicial Student Services
I'd like to express my freedom of speech by writing about my abhorrent experience as a minority student (master's program) at The University of Texas at Austin. This complaint is to educate and inform in the most respectful and truthful manner possible. I hope ethnic minorities, gays, males, and social liberals will think twice before attending The University of Texas at Austin. I experienced both discrimination and retaliation from several employees: also, termed workplace mobbing. Misandry (male hatred), hostility against men, and other forms of hate-mongering and undue influence are common at UT Austin. All of which are manufactured by the university. In my case it was based because I am a socially liberal independent person of color: the hypocrisy and authoritarian conformity within UT Austin seems to be a festering and dangerous problem in the university and off-campus. White women are actually encouraged to bully, harass, and snitch on ethnic men, gays, and other social liberals who are at the bottom of the caste system. The snitches do not fear consequences because the university protects them from whistle-blowers and those who file detailed complaints of harassment to supervisors. Dr. LaToya Hill and Martha Compton abuse the snitch culture system to harass those who are at the bottom of the caste system: they invaded my privacy repeatedly and used harassment, doublespeak, and undue influence to make me feel scared and that I should leave the academic program. I've seen such hostile hate-mongering by many of the petulant and unprofessional females who are eager to push ethnic minorities, gays, and individualistic types of people over the edge because they will not face any type of consequences: these provocateurs are protected and are even trained by the university. They scapegoat minorities and anyone who appears to be a good target for their ulterior motives. As was the case with Martha Compton: she still needs to apologize to me for the harassment and intimidation that she committed against me. Other angry, hostile, hypocritical, and incompetent hate-mongering feminists are in charge in a lot of the departments e.g., Martha Compton, Dr. Soncia Lilly, Dr. LaToya Hill, Dr. Marla Craig, Dr. Diana Damer, Dr. Isabella Cunningham, etc. They perpetuate misandry and various forms discrimination including viewpoint discrimination. They obstructed my liberty to file formal discrimination complaints with hostile innuendo and inaction. They also enforce unfair social stratification and hegemony based on gender, race, and wealth which is a severe problem. Unfortunately, White Anglo Protestant supremacy is supreme at UT Austin. Authoritarian conservatism, heteronormativity, and covert homophobia are other festering problems that I believe play a major role in illegal discrimination against minorities who do not conform to the overall hate-mongering culture: it is also discrimination against viewpoints which violated my first amendment right of freedom of speech.

There is an insidious snitch culture at UT Austin. The University of Texas at Austin uses deranged student-workers as snitches: supervised by the deans of each academic department and the unworthy dean of students. They invade your privacy and gather information about potential whistle-blowers in the name of "safety" and "security": all the while manufacturing hate and oppression behind the scenes. All information they collect on you is then disseminated to particular employees. Those employees are told to blacklist, obstruct justice, and use undue influence and intimidation to harm the targeted whistle-blower. That is called abuse of power.

Campus psychologists Dr. Marla Craig and Dr. Diana Damer are also snitches who invade your privacy and use illegal intimidation tactics. They are trained to collect information from their clients in order to use it against them as a weapon, especially if the client turns out to be a whistle-blower. They will violate confidentiality despite lip service. It has been rumored that gang-stalking and workplace mobbing is the standard operating procedure in eliminating whistle-blowers, diverse thinkers, and minorities that are not Token. Their management style resembles that of Stalinism or fascist communism. The management style is enforced by Dr. Bill Powers Jr. He actually defended Enron's board of directors claiming they were innocent in the crimes they committed. This is the type of low class professionals who dominate at UT Austin.

The University of Texas at Austin is like a corporate cult "Corporate cults are like dysfunctional families in which there are no boundaries between the individual member and the family. The family is the individual. Each person's private business is everybody's business. Less powerful members of a family or other group suffer invisible emotional damage at the hands of more powerful members. The cult overtakes a member's personhood by getting the recruit to fully disclose secret sins, thoughts, and temptations to the group. This becomes a powerful tool that the cult can use to manipulate, blackmail, and emotionally bond members to the group. It is a means of depersonalizing the member or stripping him or her of the inner self and producing a forced submission to the group." (Dave Arnott 2000, 63-64, 79)

Mobbing is common at UT Austin. It involves the use of manipulation techniques and group-think to harm an individual: "Mobbing is used to force someone to adapt to a group norm, revel in animosity, gain pleasure out of boredom, and to reinforce prejudices." (Davenport, Schwartz, and Elliott, 1999, 58-59).

Mobbing behaviors can include: "No help, promises are made and not kept, no eye contact is made with you, contact is minimized or avoided with you, you are ignored, gestures that signal humiliation, talking behind your back, communication via email that should be discussed face-to-face, having your work checked by someone unqualified to do so, policies changed or not followed, mixed messages, you are made to look inconsistent, you are set up, those supportive of you are discredited, an environment of paranoia is created, giving you tasks that you have not been adequately prepared to assume, and attacks on your private life"(Davenport, Schwartz, and Elliott, 1999, 46-47)

Mobbing is engineered to cause problems and to harm an individual: "Mobbing causes prejudice, withholds information in order for you not to complete your job, isolates you physically and
socially, holds meetings about your work without your presence, changes rules frequently, portrays the victimized person as being at fault, engineered to discredit, confuse, intimidate, and force the person into submission, and committed with the intent to force the person out." (Davenport, Schwartz, and Elliott. 1999, 41-44).

I experienced discrimination and harassment in 2008 by Martha Compton. She works in Judicial Student Services as the so-called director. The discrimination took the form of hostility, undue influence, discrimination against viewpoint, abuse of power, unfair treatment, and inaction on the part of Martha Compton and her two incompetent supervisors Dr. Soncia Lilly and Dr. Bill Powers JR. Martha Compton refused to assist me in the matters concerning discrimination, harassment, invasion of privacy, and workplace mobbing. She withheld important resources and lied to me several times. She used intimidation such as dirty looks and psychopathic innuendo to make me feel worried and humiliated. She took no action when I informed her that I was being mobbed out of the university by a petulant female student, a malicious student worker named Bruce Jeffers, and a professor. They all collaborated in spreading hateful rumors and innuendo about me. They treated me in an abusive manner in which it caused damage to my studies and learning abilities. And it caused a lot of damage to my civil rights and to my psyche: their abuse caused post traumatic stress syndrome.

When I reported this to Martha Compton and attempted to deliberate on the issues she was argumentative, angry, flippant, and incompetent. She also selectively used the investigation process to harm me when another student complained against me. What she did was damaging and abusive. She is slothful, obtuse, and morbidly obese and it appears that her obesity has stunted her reasoning and empathy skills. Do not trust her with anything. Please silence if she asks you any questions because she will use anything against you to humiliate and belittle you.

Martha Compton also violated my 4th amendment and 5th amendment rights. I had the right to be secure in my persons and files. She used coercion and intimidation to get me to speak to her about matters that were none of her business. And she used any information that I provided as a weapon to harm and sabotage my educational experiences at The University of Texas at Austin. My rights as a student and a person in the protected class status were completed eroded by Martha Compton. She was not punished in any form when Dr. Soncia Lilly was informed about Martha Compton's obvious abuse of power.

It is of your best interest to avoid Martha Compton. Do not let her investigate into any matters of yours. She is not to be trusted. Request a different investigator. And do not allow her to coerce you into signing documents that violate your privacy rights, 4th and 5th amendments.

Write a Review for Martha Compton - The University of Texas at Austin

Rate it!
Review Title
You Review
Image
Type the numbers shown

RECENTLY UPDATED REVIEWS

Taxi To Heathrow & Heathrow Taxi Transfers
Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
Ride and Shine Detail
old ironsides fake id
Digital Marketing and Company Formation Services UAE | SEO and PPC Marketing
Escort ladyluck Frankfurt
Bulk SMS Gateway in UAE | Best Bulk SMS Service In UAE

REQUESTED REVIEWS

REVIEWS BY CATEGORY